SYSTEMATIC REVIEW


Measuring Nurses' Uncertainty in Clinical Decision-making: An Integrative Review



Mitra Mousavi Shabestari1
iD
, Akram Ghahramanian1
iD
, Fariborz Roshangar1, *
iD
, Faranak Jabbarzadeh Tabrizi1
iD
, Vahid Zamanzadeh1
iD
, Parvin Sarbakhsh2
iD

1 Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran
2 Department of Statistics and Epidemiology, Faculty of Health, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 822
Abstract HTML Views: 275
PDF Downloads: 276
ePub Downloads: 156
Total Views/Downloads: 1529
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 415
Abstract HTML Views: 151
PDF Downloads: 207
ePub Downloads: 123
Total Views/Downloads: 896



Creative Commons License
© 2023 Shabestari et al.

open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Department of Medical Surgical Nursing, Nursing and Midwifery Faculty, Tabriz University of Medical Sciences, Tabriz, Iran; Tel: 0989144024683; E-mail: Froshangar@tbzmed.ac.ir


Abstract

Background:

There are complexities and controversies regarding the concept of uncertainty in clinical decision-making, making this concept difficult to use.

Objective:

This study aimed to review the definitions and instruments related to uncertainty in clinical decision-making to help researchers select better tools when examining uncertainty in nursing practice.

Methods:

To retrieve the related studies, we searched seven electronic databases, including IranMedex, Scientific Information Database (SID), MagIran, PubMed, Science Direct, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The COSMIN Consensus-based Standards for the Selection of Health Measurement Instruments (consensus-based standards for the selection of health measurement instruments) was used to determine better tools, and the PRISMA checklist was followed.

Results:

In most of the reviewed studies, the main characteristics of uncertainty were ambiguity, lack of confidence and control, complexity, being on the horns of a dilemma, unpredictability, and unexpectedness. Concerning the measurement tools, despite their acceptable validity, they were mostly measuring uncertainty tolerance.

Conclusion:

According to the results of the reviewed studies, the available tools were not specifically dedicated to measuring the uncertainty of nurses in clinical decision-making. A suitable tool can be helpful in measuring nurses' awareness about their degree of uncertainty in decision-making and nursing managers' awareness about nurses' uncertainty, thereby helping in planning to reduce the complications caused by nurses' uncertainty in clinical decision-making. Hence, it is necessary to develop suitable tools.

Keywords: Decision-making, Health care provider, Judgment, Uncertainty, Nurse, Tool.