Exacerbations of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease



Christine Garvey*, 1, 2, Gabriel Ortiz3
1 Seton Pulmonary and Cardiac Rehabilitation, Daly City, CA, USA
2 Sleep Disorders, Pulmonary Division, University of California, San Francisco, CA, USA
3 Pediatric Pulmonary Services, El Paso, TX, USA


Article Metrics

CrossRef Citations:
0
Total Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 823
Abstract HTML Views: 437
PDF Downloads: 197
Total Views/Downloads: 1457
Unique Statistics:

Full-Text HTML Views: 423
Abstract HTML Views: 234
PDF Downloads: 111
Total Views/Downloads: 768



© Garvey and Ortiz; Licensee Bentham Open.

open-access license: This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.

* Address correspondence to this author at the Seton Pulmonary & Cardiac Rehabilitation, 1900 Sullivan Ave. Daly City, CA 94015, USA; Tel: (650) 991-6776; Fax: (650) 991-6775; E-mail: chrisgarvey@dochs.org


Abstract

Epidemiologic data indicate that chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a leading cause of morbidity and mortality. Patients with poorly managed COPD are likely to experience exacerbations that require emergency department visits or hospitalization—two important drivers contributing to escalating healthcare resource use and costs associated with the disease. Exacerbations also contribute to worsening lung function and negative outcomes in COPD. The aim of this review is to present the perspective of nurse practitioners and physician assistants in terms of providing the pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic modalities needed to treat current and prevent future exacerbations. Major respiratory guidelines recommend treatment of acute exacerbations with short-acting bronchodilators, oral corticosteroids and antibiotics, as appropriate. Supplementary oxygen and/or ventilatory support may also be beneficial to selected patients. Treatments to minimize the risk of future exacerbations should include maintenance pharmacotherapies, risk-reduction measures (e.g. smoking cessation, influenza and pneumonia vaccinations), pulmonary rehabilitation, self-management support and follow-up care.

Keywords: COPD, exacerbations, follow-up care, nurse practitioner, physician assistant.



INTRODUCTION

The 2010 Year of the Lung Declaration [1] made by the Forum of International Respiratory Societies was designed to increase awareness and action on respiratory conditions, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD). Without interventions to cut risks, deaths from this widely prevalent, underdiagnosed, preventable and treatable condition (caused mainly by smoking and possibly less well-recognized risk factors) are projected to increase by more than 30% over the next decade [2-4]. The increasing airway obstruction, lung hyperinflation and physical activity limitations characteristic of stable disease progression are attributed primarily to a heterogeneous mixture of lung-structural abnormalities that may vary among individuals [5]. Exacerbations or worsening of symptoms, such as chronic cough, sputum production and dyspnea, punctuate the natural history of COPD and account for most of the health and financial burden associated with this disease [6]. These costs have been estimated to be as high as US$7,757 per exacerbation [7], with the largest component of the total costs of COPD exacerbations typically resulting from hospitalization. Although the costs can vary, they are associated with the severity of the exacerbation. Indirect costs have rarely been measured, but these resource-associated financial consequences of COPD exacerbations are likely to contribute substantially to overall costs. In addition, mortality rates are high, reaching 40% at one year in those individuals needing ventilatory support and up to 49% by three years following hospitalization for an acute exacerbation [5].

Evidence from the literature suggests that there is a high-risk, eight-week window of possible recurrence following an initial exacerbation [8] and a high-risk subpopulation who experience frequent exacerbations (≤6-month intervals; >3-per year) [9]. Results from the Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) [10] study suggest that there is a frequent-exacerbation phenotype of COPD that is independent of disease severity. These patients have faster lung function decline and worse health-related quality of life compared with patients who have infrequent exacerbations [9]. Overall, the classic view of exacerbations as random events has been replaced by the recognition that the future risk of an exacerbation can be correlated to a history of past exacerbations [6]. In addition, the likelihood of a second event may be related to therapy used for an initial exacerbation [11] or non-resolution of the systemic inflammatory response [12]. Acute exacerbations occur more often in winter [13, 14] and accelerate disease progression [6].

The increasing presence of physician assistants (PAs) and nurse practitioners (NPs) in medical specialty, internal medicine and underserved settings [15] makes it likely that these healthcare providers will serve as important contacts for patients experiencing exacerbations. In an era where medicine requires collaborative multidisciplinary problem-solving to deliver affordable, quality care, it is important that all healthcare providers, including NPs and PAs, effectively manage patients with COPD during chronic, stable periods and accurately diagnose and treat acute exacerbations to improve patient outcomes. Recent reports have highlighted the important role of nurse-led management programs in improving patient outcomes [16-19]. This review focuses on interventions in outpatient and inpatient settings and addresses important areas where healthcare providers can play a role in preventing or delaying exacerbation recurrence.

DEFINITION

There is no clear consensus on the definition of COPD exacerbations across all settings as a result of the wide heterogeneity of clinical presentation and disease progression [20], although exacerbations can be stratified as mild, moderate, or severe according to the symptomatic criteria first proposed by Anthonisen et al., in 1987 [21]. These criteria by 1 of 3 symptoms: increased breathlessness; increased sputum volume; new or increased sputum purulence, are divided into mild (1 symptom), moderate (2 symptoms) and severe (1 symptom with at least 1 additional feature, including: upper respiratory tract infection in the previous 5 days, fever without other cause, increased wheezing or cough, or a 20% increase in respiratory or heart rate compared with baseline).

Cross-study differences in exacerbations reflect to some extent the differences in definitions used and classifications of these events [5, 22, 23]. In general, symptom- or healthcare utilization–based definitions are used. A symptom-based definition which is widely accepted and incorporated into key guidelines (e.g. Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease GOLD [5] and American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society [ATS/ERS] [22]) is “an event in the natural course of the disease characterized by a change in the patient’s baseline dyspnea, cough and/or sputum that is beyond normal day-to-day variations, is acute in onset and may warrant a change in regular medication in a patient with underlying COPD”[5]. Healthcare utilization–defined exacerbations, such as any hospital admission with a primary diagnosis of COPD including those related to COPD, bronchitis or (in some cases) asthma by any physician in emergency departments, offices or hospital, can be treated as one episode if the interval between adjacent contacts is less than 14 days [24]. Such definitions have been used as a clinical endpoint in some major trials [23], since, in the absence of daily diaries to record symptoms, they are more readily recalled.

The GOLD guidelines [5] focus on appropriate antibiotic selection in further classifying exacerbations, whereas ATS/ERS [22] stratifies exacerbations according to the need for healthcare utilization. A composite system for ranking exacerbations according to their degree of severity is shown in Fig. (1) [5, 21, 22].

Fig. (1).

Ranking of COPD exacerbations and risk factors for relapse.a


The lack of consensus means that NPs and PAs, as well as physicians, working in primary care report lack of awareness and use of COPD guidelines, and also feel a need for correct information related to epidemiology of the condition and the different benefits of available treatment strategies [25].

ETIOLOGY

Respiratory infections are associated with the majority of COPD exacerbations and their severity [26], including viral (Rhinovirus spp., influenza) and/or bacterial (Haemophilus influenzae, Streptococcus pneumoniae, Moraxella catarrhalis, Enterobacteriaceae spp., Pseudomonas spp.) infections of the tracheobronchial tree. However, a clinically significant number of exacerbations occur without the presence of detectable infection [26]. Furthermore, most patients have evidence of bacterial colonization, and potentially pathogenic organisms can be recovered from the respiratory tract secretions of virtually all patients with COPD [27]. Non-microbiologic causes include environmental irritants and lack of adherence to prescribed treatments, including medications and oxygen therapy, and failure to participate in pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) [22]. Oxidative stress may be an important mechanism that contributes to the amplified inflammatory response characteristic of COPD exacerbations [5].

Exacerbation frequency may be independently associated with progression of disease, a history of exacerbations, poorer health related-quality of life, elevated white blood cell counts and a history of heartburn [10]. Understanding the mechanism underlying exacerbation frequency may lead to improved preventive therapies.

DIAGNOSIS

The lack of an agreed upon (or consensus) classification as to COPD exacerbations, and signs and symptoms common to other conditions, complicates diagnosis. Differential diagnosis is thus important to correctly identify an exacerbation of COPD in respect of possibly confounding history and physical signs. Radiography can assist in ruling out pneumonia and pneumothorax, while electrocardiography is useful to eliminate diagnosis of right ventricular hypertrophy, arrhythmia, or ischemia [5].

However, in regular practice, NPs and PAs can play a leading role by administering screening questionnaires at presentation. These should be used routinely to assess risk factors and medical history, including genetic predisposition to underlying COPD [28]. The ATS/ERS guidelines suggest a number of elements to assist in the evaluation and diagnosis of exacerbations, based on clinical history, physical findings, and laboratory diagnostic procedures [17]. In addition, the GOLD guidelines recommend monitoring symptom patterns and appropriateness of current pharmacologic treatments. Symptom patterns of particular importance are increased dyspnea and more “winter colds,” prior exacerbation or respiratory disorder–related hospitalization, and presence of comorbidities that may restrict activity [5].

Measurement of arterial blood gases is important in determining the severity of an exacerbation [5]. This can be enhanced by monitoring blood oxygenation via pulse oximetry, with change from baseline established by prior lung function and laboratory tests in patients known to have COPD, and assessing severity of symptoms (e.g. change in sputum volume or color, use of accessory respiratory muscles, paradoxical chest wall movements, onset of peripheral edema, somnolence, cyanosis and signs of right heart failure) in patients experiencing exacerbations [5]. Although spirometry is recommended to diagnose and stage stable COPD cases (Table 1) [5], pulmonary function testing is not recommended for patients in the midst of an exacerbation, as it shows only a weak correlation with arterial blood gases.

Table 1.

Disease Staging and General Symptomsa


Stage FEV1/FVC FEV1 Predicted General COPD Symptoms
I (mild) <0.7 ≥80% Chronic cough or sputum production may be present (but not always)
II (moderate) <0.7 50% ≥FEV1 <80% Exertional dyspnea develops (cough and sputum production sometimes present); some patients may have frequent exacerbations
III (severe) <0.7 30% ≥FEV1 <50% Greater exertional dyspnea, fatigue and repeated exacerbations
IV (very severe) <0.7 FEV1 <30% or 50% predicted plus chronic respiratory failure Symptoms worsen; potentially life-threatening exacerbations

FEV1=forced expiratory volume in 1 second; FVC=forced vital capacity; COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Please refer to reference [5] as cited in text.

Specific systemic biomarkers are beginning to be identified in association with exacerbations and their recurrence; for example, patients who experience frequent exacerbations have been found to have significantly higher levels of serum IL-6 and C-reactive protein (CRP) during their recovery period after an exacerbation, and high serum CRP concentrations measured 14 days after an index exacerbation can predict recurrent exacerbations within 50 days [12]. Other known risk factors for relapse are listed in Fig. (1) [5, 21, 22].

Treatment

Nurse practitioners and PAs should work collaboratively with the healthcare team, patient and family members to achieve evidence based, short and long term outcomes in patients with COPD including prevention and early and effective management of exacerbations. A treatment algorithm encompassing pharmacologic and non-pharmacologic strategies is presented in Fig. (2) [29]. Milder exacerbations may respond to an increase in the dose and/or frequency of existing bronchodilator therapy [5]. It is important to emphasize that exacerbation severity does not always equal severity of the underlying disease (e.g. individuals with mild COPD may experience an acute sentinel event whereas the opposite may be true for patients with severe disease) [29].

Fig. (2).

Treatment algorithm for exacerbations.a


Fig. (2) [29] shows both treatment of acute exacerbations (using short-acting bronchodilators (example in Table 2) [5, 23, 30] and other agents to prevent relapse and rehospitalization) and post-exacerbation management (using maintenance pharmacotherapies (examples in Table 2) [5, 23, 30] and non-pharmacologic strategies to prevent future exacerbations and interrupt pulmonary decline).

Table 2.

Examples of COPD Pharmacotherapiesa


Drug Class (Example) Recommended Purpose (Drug Class)
Increase Dose and/or Frequency for Acute Exacerbations
Short-acting β2-agonist Can be used during all stages of the disease
  • Albuterol
Long-Acting Agents (for prevention of future exacerbations)
LABA Maintenance therapy beginning in GOLD II; more effective than short-acting agents alone
  • Formoterol
  • Arfomoterol
  • Salmeterol
Long-acting anticholinergic Maintenance therapy beginning in GOLD II; more effective than short-acting agents alone
  • Tiotropium1
LABA/inhaled corticosteroid combinations Can be used for the treatment of patients with severe and very severe COPD
  • Salmeterol/Fluticasone2

Indicated to reduce exacerbations.

Indicated to reduce exacerbations in COPD patients with a history of exacerbations.

LABA=Long-acting β2-agonist; GOLD II=Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease stage II (moderate COPD); COPD=chronic obstructive pulmonary disease.

Please refer to references [5, 23, 30] as cited in text.

Acute Exacerbations

Increasing the dose and frequency of short-acting bronchodilators is a necessary first step in the treatment of acute exacerbations, with the addition of oral corticosteroids for individuals unresponsive to the first intervention [29]. Changes in sputum characteristics may necessitate the addition of antibiotics appropriate to the causative bacterial pathogen (e.g. anti-pseudomonal β-lactams may be needed if Pseudomonas spp. are present, as is sometimes the case with severe exacerbations) [5]. However, it should be noted that in many cases the etiology cannot be confirmed, due to colonization, and thus even when bacteria are cultured from samples, this may not prove to be beneficial prior to initiating treatment. However, when a causative organism can be identified, individual, local and regional antibiotic-resistance patterns, as well as drug availability, side effects and treatment duration are important considerations in the selection of an antibiotic [5, 29]. Thus far, the prophylactic use of antibiotics for prevention of exacerbations has not been tested in real-world settings. Additional interventions, such as theophylline, may be required in selected cases where the clinical response to treatment is incomplete [29]. However, the use of theophylline is subject to the need for close monitoring of serum levels because of known side effects and pharmacokinetic interactions with other medication. An increased dosage may be required in patients who continue to smoke and in patients taking medications that are eliminated hepatically. A dosage reduction is necessary in patients with hepatic failure or congestive heart failure, and in those patients receiving, among other medications, macrolide antibiotics, quinolone antibiotics, allopurinol, oral contraceptives, and histamine H2-receptor blocking agents [31]. Furthermore, monitoring serum theophylline levels following dosage adjustment is important for maintenance of a therapeutic drug level.

Criteria listed in Table 3 [5] are grounds for prompt admission to the hospital or intensive care unit, where local resources regarding personnel, skills and equipment for managing acute respiratory failure are available. Supplemental oxygen therapy is necessary at any stage in the presence of new or established hypoxemia and/or respiratory failure (Fig. 2) [29], with a goal of improving baseline blood oxygenation to a partial pressure level of at least 60 mm Hg at sea level and to produce a saturation level of oxygen of at least 90% for an uncomplicated exacerbation [5]. Non-invasive positive pressure ventilation is considered to be effective in reversing acute respiratory failure in selected patients with elevated carbon dioxide and no other life-threatening comorbidities who are able to cooperate with healthcare providers [22]. A need for oxygen and/or ventilatory support, premature onset (aged <40 years) or severe disease, precipitous health decline and new comorbidities (Fig. 2) [29] are all reasons for referring patients to a specialist [22].

Table 3.

Indicators for Hospital or ICU Admission for Patients with Exacerbationsa


Hospital Admission1
  • Advanced age or very little family/home support
  • Uncertain diagnosis
  • Severe disease/increased severity or frequency of symptoms
  • Development of new symptoms, such as peripheral edema and cyanosis
  • Significant comorbidities
  • Newly occurring arrhythmias
ICU Admission
  • Severe breathlessness, unresponsive to initial therapy
  • Confusion, lethargy, coma or other changes in mental status
  • Hypercapnia, respiratory acidosis or worsening hypoxemia despite appropriate interventions
  • Requirement for invasive mechanical ventilation
  • Hemodynamic instability, e.g. tachycardia, arrhythmias or hypotension

Local resources should be considered.

ICU=intensive care unit.

Please refer to reference [5] as cited in text.

PREVENTION OF FUTURE EXACERBATIONS

Although long-term, multifaceted care is a goal for all patients with COPD, it is of particular importance to those who have recovered from acute exacerbations. To prevent relapse, the GOLD guidelines [5] suggest spirometric evaluations 4-6 weeks after hospitalization for an acute exacerbation; however, the utility of these results in terms of modifying therapy awaits evaluation in randomized, controlled trials. Generally, risk-reduction measures (e.g. smoking cessation counseling and appropriate vaccinations), maintenance pharmacotherapies, PR and self-management support form the key components of long-term management to prevent future exacerbations. Self management plans for COPD are available at: http://www.lunguk.org/supporting-you/Publications/copd_self_management_plan and http://ww w.livingwellwithcopd.com/ password is copd.

Clinicians should understand principles of collaborative disease self management. Of significant importance in COPD is working with the patient and medical team to support long-term smoking cessation, influenza and pneumococcal vaccination, effective use of optimal medication, such as long-acting bronchodilators, patient understanding of prevention, and prompt reporting of symptoms suggestive of exacerbation or lung infection and regular clinician follow-up.

Approved long-acting β-agonists (LABAs) or long-acting anticholinergics (LAACs), administered individually or in combination therapies (Table 2) [5, 23, 30], have been shown to be effective for the maintenance treatment of stable COPD. Together with results from two separate megatrials [23, 30], the exacerbation-reducing benefits of the LABA/inhaled corticosteroid combination, salmeterol/fluticasone, and the LAAC, tiotropium, suggest that these medications can reduce disease progression. More precisely, salmeterol/fluticasone and tiotropium can potentially decrease exacerbation frequency or prevent future exacerbations, thereby reducing the need for healthcare utilization.

In addition, PR, including patient education on disease self-management strategies and monitored, supervised exercise, has been shown to improve dyspnea, exercise capacity and quality of life, and has been shown to reduce healthcare utilization in persons with chronic lung disease.

There is emerging evidence regarding the role of PR in patients recovering from an acute event, particularly if sustained over the long-term [5].

Self-management plans, whether independently administered or incorporated as part of PR (e.g. physician-directed action plan, including prescriptions of relevant medications and strategies for optimizing daily activities), empower patients to recognize symptoms and provide a guide as to appropriate next steps. Regardless of the established long-term plan, patients should be examined within at least four weeks following hospital discharge [22].

The goals of the initial follow-up and regular treatment reviews are primarily to monitor disease progression, symptoms and overall health status of the patient (Table 4) [5]. However, regular provider—patient meetings also present opportunities for the NP/PA to establish a rapport with patients and better understand their personal and health-related goals. It has been established that treatment plans incorporating, for example, individualized diet and exercise programs; education around pharmacotherapies, disease, inhalation techniques [32] and relaxation practices, can improve the mental and physical well-being of patients. Regular follow-up also allows the healthcare practitioner to note early signs of exacerbations and educate patients about the importance of symptom reporting (e.g. as part of a self-management plan) and self-management.

Table 4.

Follow-Up and Regular Review of Patients with Exacerbationsa


Risk Factors
  • Assess any modifiable risk factors
  • Assess smoking behavior since index event
  • Ask if patient wants to quit smoking
Disease Progression and Patient Health Status
  • Assess dyspnea qualitatively through questions regarding ADL
  • Note patient perceptions regarding own symptoms and abilities to perform ADL
  • Note somnolence, development of new or worsening of current symptoms
  • Assess any medical care sought by patient after index event
  • Enable access to appropriate treatments and management of comorbidities
Treatment Review
  • Assess patient adherence to prescribed dosing of medication
  • Assess inhalation technique for relevant medications
  • Assess the use of alternate remedies
  • Ask about difficulties in filling prescriptions, e.g. due to cost
  • Note patient perceptions regarding treatment efficacy
  • Adjust treatments if necessary according to patient needs and preferences
  • In patients who continue to smoke, work collaboratively with the patient’s physician to assist the patient with effective, long-term cessation by prescribing effect medication, giving the patient clear, supportive message to quit, and referring the patient to community cessation programs.

ADL=activities of daily living.

Please refer to reference [5] as cited in text.

ROLE OF NPs AND PAs

The management of COPD exacerbations is variable in critical [33] and primary care [34] settings, in spite of recommendations from major respiratory guidelines [5, 22]. Delegating collaborative patient evaluation, management and follow-up in an orchestrated manner by NPs and PAs in these settings may improve the consistency and quality of care in patients who are prone to or experiencing an exacerbation. Historically, supervised NPs and PAs have provided similar quality of emergency care to patients with acute respiratory disease as physicians have provided [35]. A vital part of expanding NP and PA involvement in all aspects of exacerbation management is to increase their knowledge base, the positive effects of which are shown in the results from the Stemming the Tide of Antibiotic Resistance (STARS) [36] educational initiative, which included NPs as participants. In addition, Sridhar et al., [37] reported that nurse-led care for patients who were hospitalized with an acute exacerbation, including PR, self-management education and an action plan, resulted in reduced primary care consultations and mortality rates.

CONCLUSIONS

Expanded knowledge of treatment components could positively affect healthcare-provider management, and prescribing practices and attitudes in the treatment of exacerbations of COPD. Further studies are needed to assess the impact of real-world interventions involving NPs and PAs on preventing or delaying exacerbation recurrence in patients following recovery from an index event.

CONFLICT OF INTEREST

Chris Garvey has received consultation fees from Boehringer Ingelheim/Pfizer and Sepracor and is a speakers’ bureau member for Boehringer Ingelheim. Gabriel Ortiz has been a consultant to Boehringer Ingelheim, CSL Behring, Pfizer, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough/Merck, Sepracor and TEVA, and is a member of the following speakers’ bureaus: Phadia US/Quest Diagnostics, Sanofi-Aventis, Schering-Plough/Merck and TEVA.

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS

Manuscript preparation, including medical writing assistance which was provided by Zeena Nackerdien, PhD, of Envision Scientific Solutions, was supported by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Pfizer Inc. The article reflects the concepts of the authors and is their sole responsibility. It was not reviewed by Boehringer Ingelheim Pharmaceuticals Inc. and Pfizer Inc, except to ensure medical and safety accuracy.

REFERENCES

[1] Forum of International Respiratory Societies. 2010: The Year of the Lung Declaration Available from: http://dev.ersnet.org/uploads/Document/9c/WEB_CHEMIN_5600_1260787644.pdf. Published December 6, 2009 [Accessed August 15, 2011];
[2] Mannino DM. COPD: epidemiology, prevalence, morbidity and mortality, and disease heterogeneity Chest 2002; 121: 121S-6S.
[3] World Health Organization. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Fact sheet No. 315 Available from: http://www.who.int/mediacentre/factsheets/fs315/en. Published February 2011 [Accessed August 18, 2011];
[4] Eisner MD, Anthonisen N, Coultas D, et al. Committee on Nonsmoking COPD, Environmental and Occupational Health Assembly. An official American Thoracic Society public policy statement: novel risk factors and the global burden of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182: 693-718.
[5] Global Initiative for Chronic Obstructive Lung Disease. Global strategy for diagnosis, management, and prevention of COPD, updated 2010 Available from: http://www.goldcopd.org/uploads/users/files/GOLDReport_April112011.pdf [Accessed July 11, 2011];
[6] Donaldson GC, Wedzicha JA. COPD exacerbations. 1: epidemiology Thorax 2006; 61: 164-8.
[7] Toy EL, Gallagher KF, Stanley EL, Swensen AR, Duh MS. The economic impact of exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease and exacerbation definition: a review COPD 2010; 7: 214-8.
[8] Hurst JR, Donaldson GC, Quint JK, Goldring JJ, Baghai-Ravary R, Wedzicha JA. Temporal clustering of exacerbations in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2009; 179: 369-74.
[9] Soler-Cataluña JJ, Martínez-García MA, Román Sánchez P, Salcedo E, Navarro M, Ochando R. Severe acute exacerbations and mortality in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Thorax 2005; 60: 925-31.
[10] Hurst JR, Vestbo J, Anzueto A, et al. Evaluation of COPD Longitudinally to Identify Predictive Surrogate Endpoints (ECLIPSE) Investigators. Susceptibility to exacerbation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease N Engl J Med 2010; 363: 1128-38.
[11] Roede BM, Bresser P, Bindels PJ, et al. Antibiotic treatment is associated with reduced risk of a subsequent exacerbation in obstructive lung disease: an historical population based cohort study Thorax 2008; 63: 968-73.
[12] Perera WR, Hurst JR, Wilkinson TM, et al. Inflammatory changes, recovery and recurrence at COPD exacerbation Eur Respir J 2007; 29: 527-34.
[13] Jenkins CR, Celli B, Anderson JA, et al. Seasonality and determinants of moderate and severe COPD exacerbations in the TORCH study Eur Respir J 2012; 39(1): 38-45.
[14] Bruce ML, McEvoy P. COPD: your role in early detection Nurse Pract 2007; 32: 24-34.
[15] Dehn RW. The development of varying physician assistant roles in the United States JAAPA 2010; 23: 53-4.
[16] Zakrisson AB, Engfeldt P, Hagglund D, et al. Nurse-led multidisciplinary programme for patients with COPD in primary health care: a controlled trial Prim Care Respir J 2011; 20(4): 427-33.
[17] Casey D, Murphy K, Cooney A, Mee L. Developing a structured education programme for clients with COPD Br J Community Nurs 2011; 16: 231-7.
[18] Elsherif M, Noble H. Management of COPD using the Roper-Logan-Tierney framework Br J Nurs 2011; 20: 29-33.
[19] Sorknaes AD, Madsen H, Hallas J, Jest P, Hansen-Nord M. Nurse tele-consultations with discharged COPD patients reduce early readmissions--an interventional study Clin Respir J 2011; 5: 26-34.
[20] Han MK, Agusti A, Calverley PM, et al. Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease phenotypes: the future of COPD Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2010; 182: 598-604.
[21] Anthonisen NR, Manfreda J, Warren CP, Hershfield ES, Harding GK, Nelson NA. Antibiotic therapy in exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Ann Intern Med 1987; 106: 196-204.
[22] American Thoracic Society/European Respiratory Society Task Force. Standards for the diagnosis and management of patients with COPD. Version 1.2. New York, NY: American Thoracic Society 2004 Available from: http://www.thoracic.org/go/copd [Accessed July 11 2011];
[23] Tashkin DP, Celli B, Senn S, et al. UPLIFT Study Investigators. A 4-year trial of tiotropium in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease N Engl J Med 2008; 359: 1543-54.
[24] Burge S, Wedzicha JA. COPD exacerbations: definitions and classifications Eur Respir J Suppl 2003; 41: 46s-53s.
[25] Yawn BP, Wollan PC. Knowledge and attitudes of family physicians coming to COPD continuing medical education Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis 2008; 3: 311-7.
[26] Papi A, Bellettato CM, Braccioni F, et al. Infections and airway inflammation in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease severe exacerbations Am J Respir Crit Care Med 2006; 173: 1114-21.
[27] Fagon JY, Chastre J. Severe exacerbations of COPD patients: the role of pulmonary infections Semin Respir Infect 1996; 11: 109-8.
[28] Duvall K, Frank GW. Identifying chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary care of urban underserved patients: tools, applications, and challenges J Natl Med Assoc 2010; 102: 570-8.
[29] Hurst JR, Wedzicha JA. Management and prevention of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease exacerbations: a state of the art review BMC Med 2009; 7: 40.
[30] Calverley PM, Anderson JA, Celli B, et al. TORCH investigators. Salmeterol and fluticasone propionate and survival in chronic obstructive pulmonary disease N Engl J Med 2007; 356: 775-89.
[31] Heath JM, Mongia R. Chronic bronchitis: primary care management Am Fam Physician 1998; 57: 2365-72. 76-8
[32] Garvey C, Ortiz G, Yawn BP. Toward better COPD management – practical aspects of inhaler use in COPD Adv NPs PAs 2011; 2: 27.
[33] Tsai CL, Sobrino JA, Camargo CA Jr. National study of emergency department visits for acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, 1993-2005 Acad Emerg Med 2008; 15: 1275-83.
[34] Bourbeau J, Sebaldt RJ, Day A, et al. Practice patterns in the management of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease in primary practice: the CAGE study Can Respir J 2008; 15: 13-9.
[35] Tsai CL, Sullivan AF, Ginde AA, Camargo CA Jr. Quality of emergency care provided by physician assistants and nurse practitioners in acute asthma Am J Emerg Med 2010; 28: 485-91.
[36] Bekkers MJ, Simpson SA, Dunstan F, et al. Enhancing the quality of antibiotic prescribing in primary care: qualitative evaluation of a blended learning intervention BMC Fam Pract 2010; 11: 34.
[37] Sridhar M, Taylor R, Dawson S, Roberts NJ, Partridge MR. A nurse led intermediate care package in patients who have been hospitalised with an acute exacerbation of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease Thorax 2008; 63: 194-200.