What Causes Health Promotion Behaviors in College Students?
Mi Young Kim1, Yu Jeong Kim2, *
Identifiers and Pagination:Year: 2018
First Page: 106
Last Page: 115
Publisher Id: TONURSJ-12-106
Article History:Received Date: 20/3/2018
Revision Received Date: 23/05/2018
Acceptance Date: 5/06/2018
Electronic publication date: 29/6/2018
Collection year: 2018
open-access license: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International Public License (CC-BY 4.0), a copy of which is available at: https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/legalcode. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
College students are exposed to an environment that places their health at risk. As a result, they are vulnerable to health-related problems. In order to improve health promotion behaviors, it is necessary to identify the variables affecting these behaviors. However, few studies have comprehensively examined health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem as variables in health promotion behaviors among college students.
The purpose of this study is to identify the factors influencing health promotion behaviors in college students.
Data were collected from 331 students, using a structured questionnaire based on the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile (health promotion behaviors), Dutta-Bergman’s Health Consciousness Scale (health consciousness), the Health Perception Questionnaire (health perception), Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale (self-esteem), and sociodemographic data. To assess the factors that influence health promotion behaviors, a multiple regression analysis was performed.
Health promotion behaviors were higher when health cognition was higher (r=.421, p<.001), health perception was higher (r=.326, p<.001), and self-esteem was higher (r=.526, p<.001). The constructed model for health promotion behaviors showed that the statistically significant explanatory variables were health cognition, health perception, and self-esteem. The model explained 34.9% of the variance in health promotion behaviors.
It will be necessary to develop an intervention program targeting health cognition, health perception, and self-esteem in order to increase health promotion behaviors in college students.
As a major variable influencing individual well-being, health-related habits, especially those established during college, continue to affect health after early adulthood . Nevertheless, college students experience a lack of sleep and psychological stress due to an irregular lifestyle filled with various scholastic events and gatherings - including festivals and outings - alongside a heavy academic workload and job preparation activities. They are also easily exposed to smoking and drinking. Such an environment has a negative effect on their physical and mental health . As such, the college period is one in which students are exposed to an environment that places their health at risk, although the threat to their health is not necessarily obvious. This period is regarded as one in which students are vulnerable to health-related problems because activities promoting health are not readily available. This vulnerability is compounded by the lack of concern of students to health management , and the ease with which the importance of health is ignored .
Health promotion is an educational, social, and environmental approach intended to improve health through the introduction of beneficial lifestyles and habits. It is designed to help people reach optimal levels of physical, mental, social, and spiritual well-being . In other words, health promotion behaviors involve performing proactive activities for self-actualization and improvement, as well as for disease treatment and prevention . In the US, efforts are being made to educate college students about the importance of health management and how lifestyle changes can be made accordingly . Health management in Korea, however, focuses on middle- and late-adulthood because these are the periods in which health-related problems become apparent. In Korea, there is relatively less interest in health-related problems of college students ; indeed, health promotion tends to decrease sharply after the age of 18, which is the age at which most people start college . It is very important to establish health promotion among college-age students because it is relatively easier to change behavioral patterns during early adulthood, rather than in middle- and late adulthood. Moreover, habits formed during this period can determine later patterns of health behavior . Thus, an effort to improve health promotion behaviors among college students is necessary. In order to achieve this, it is first necessary to identify the variables affecting these behaviors.
According to previous studies, variables influencing health promotion and behavior include sex, religion, type of residence , and university year . Key cognitive variables include health consciousness-that is, how one thinks about one’s health status -and health beliefs, which are how an individual’s subjective beliefs shape their behavior related to preventing disease . In addition, health perception-a subjective process of how health-related issues are understood-is presented as a variable affecting health promotion behaviors . There are also several socio-psychological variables including socio-psychological health , self-efficacy, perceived benefit and disability, health status and importance , self-esteem, and social support . Among these, low self-esteem contributes to disease, as low self-esteem decreases belief in the ability to influence one’s environment and situation, which in turn affects health promotion behaviors . This could be an important variable in the promotion of health behavior among college students, who enter an autonomous environment, and experience dramatic physical, emotional, and social changes as they transition into adulthood. Nonetheless, there are few studies that comprehensively examine health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem as variables affecting health promotion behaviors among college students. This research focuses on the impact that attitudes towards health have on health promotion in college students; the factors considered include health consciousness and health perception (i.e., subjective understanding of one’s health), as well as self-esteem (i.e., attitude towards oneself). Accordingly, this study investigates the levels of health consciousness, health perception, self-esteem, and the promotion of health behaviors among college students. In doing so, this research identifies the variables affecting health promotion and behavior, and provides baseline data for the development of interventions in health promotion activities for college students.
1.2. Research Purposes
The purpose of this study is to examine the levels of health consciousness in college students; it examines their health perception, self-esteem, and health promotion behaviors, in order to identify differences based on general characteristics. In doing so, this study will identify the variables that influence health promotion behaviors. The specific purposes of this research are summarized as follows:
First, this research aims to identify the degree of health consciousness in college students, as well as their health perception, self-esteem, and health promotion behaviors.
Second, this research aims to identify differences in health consciousness, health perception, self-esteem, and health promotion behaviors depending on general characteristics.
Third, this research aims to identify possible correlations between health consciousness, health perception, self-esteem, and health promotion behaviors.
Fourth, this research aims to identify variables that predict the promotion of health behavior among college students.
2. MATERIALS AND METHODS
2.1. Research Design
This is a quantitative cross-sectional descriptive survey intended to identify the level of health promotion behaviors among college students and the related variables.
2.2. Research Participants
The participants of this research were students from two universities in Korea. The required sample size was calculated using G*Power 3.1  with an effect size of .04, a power of .8, an α of .05, and the number of predictors as 3; this produced the result of 277 participants. Based on this number, this study took a dropout rate of 20% into consideration, hardcopy questionnaires were disseminated to 335 people.
2.3. Research Tools
2.3.1. Health Consciousness
Health consciousness is a concept indicating how integrated one’s interest in health is with one’s daily activities . This research used a tool adapted by Suh  for the Korean context from Dutta-Bergman’s health consciousness scale , to measure college students’ health consciousness. Using a 5-point Likert scale, this tool has five questions with “strongly disagree” as a 1-point response and “strongly agree” as a 5-point response. Higher points indicate a higher level of health consciousness, which suggests an individual is health-oriented and has a positive attitude towards behaviors such as exercise and eating healthy food. In terms of the tool’s reliability, Cronbach’s α was .80 in a previous study , and .79 in this research.
2.3.2. Health Perception
Health perception refers to self-evaluation of an individual’s physical and mental well-being . This research used a tool adapted from the Health Perception Questionnaire developed by Ware , which was revised accordingly for the Korean context and assessed for adequate reliability and validity . This tool consists of six categories: current health, past health, future health, health interest and concern, resistance and sensitivity, and patient role rejection. This tool has 20 questions measured on a 5-point Likert scale, with “never” as a 1-point response and “always” as a 5-point response, with the final score ranging between 20 and 100 points. Negative questions were inversely scored, such that higher scores on this scale indicated a higher degree of health perception. In terms of the tool’s reliability, Cronbach’s α was .91 in a previous study , and .74 in this research.
Self-esteem was measured using Rosenberg’s Self-Esteem Scale . This scale conceptualizes self-esteem as a single dimension so that the participant can evaluate him or herself comprehensively. This study used a tool of the Rosenberg scale adapted by Jon  for the Korean context. The self-esteem scale consists of five positive questions and five negative questions, and the negative questions were scored inversely. Using a 5-point Likert scale, with “strongly disagree” as a 1-point response and “strongly agree” as a 5-point response, with the final score ranging between 10 and 50 points. On this scale, higher points indicated a higher level of self-esteem. In terms of the tool’s reliability, Cronbach’s α was .78 in a previous study , and .75 in this research.
2.3.4. Health Promotion Behaviors
Health promotion behaviors are a proactive response to the environment that enables to achieve a higher level of health. Pender  has noted that, as an expression of self-actualization tendencies in humans, health promotion behaviors are not related to specific diseases or problems; rather, it is an act aimed at maintaining and promoting an individual’s well-being, self-actualization, and self-fulfillment. This study used a tool adapted and revised by Seo  for the Korean context from the Health Promoting Lifestyle Profile (HPLP), which was originally developed by Walker, Sechrist, and Pender . The adapted tool consists of 47 questions: 11 self-actualization questions, 10 health responsibility questions, 12 exercise and nutrition questions, 7 interpersonal relationship questions, and 7 stress management questions. This tool uses a 4-point Likert scale, with “never” being a 1-point response and “regularly” being a 4-point response, with a final score ranging between 47 and 188 points. On this scale, higher points indicated a higher level of health promotion behaviors. In terms of the tool’s reliability, Cronbach’s α was .89 in a previous study  and .93 in this research.
2.4. Data Collection
Data was collected from college students attending two universities in Korea between November 20 and December 16, 2016. The researcher explained the study’s objectives and the questionnaire items to students enrolled in chapel class after obtaining approval from the minister in charge of the chapel class. Chapel classes were chosen because they comprised all liberal arts classes, regardless of participant major. Questionnaires were disseminated to participants who agreed to participate by providing their consent in writing. It took participants an average of 15 minutes to complete the questionnaire. The questionnaires were then submitted in a collection box.
2.5. Ethical Considerations
Appropriate measures were taken to protect participants against coercion or unjust influence during the recruitment or consent process. Only those who voluntarily agreed to participate could fill out the questionnaire; an explanation of the research purposes and the questionnaire was provided. It was made clear to the students that they had the freedom to not participate in this research, that there were no advantages or disadvantages resulting from their participation in this research, and that they could quit at any time even if they had agreed to participate. The participation agreement included a statement about protecting the participants’ anonymity and confidentiality, and explained that participating in this research would have no impact on their grades etcetera.
2.6. Data Analysis
The collected data were analyzed using the IBM SPSS 20.0 program. The general characteristics of the participants—as well as their health consciousness, health perception, self-esteem, and health promotion behaviors—were indicated in counts, percentages, means, and standard deviations. The level of health promotion behaviors, depending on participants’ general characteristics, was measured using a t-test and one-way ANOVA. The Pearson’s correlation coefficient was calculated to analyze correlations between variables. In addition, to identify their effect on health promotion behaviors, variables that correlated significantly with health promotion behaviors were entered as independent variables in a multiple regression analysis. Statistical significance was adopted at the level of p<.05.
3.1. Health Promotion Behaviors According to the General Characteristics of Participants
With the exception of four questionnaires, in which responses were invalid, this research analyzed a total of 331 respondents’ questionnaire. The general characteristics of the participants were as follows: the average age was 20.48 years, with 228 participants (68.9%) in their 20s or older; 210 (63.4%) of the participants were women; 2nd grade of university accounted for 204 (61.6%) of the participants; and 202 (61.0%) indicated that they followed no religion. Of the total respondents, 33 (10%) claimed to have experienced a relatively serious disease, while 154 (46.5%) reported that family members, close relatives, or significant others had experienced a serious disease (Table 1).
|Characteristics||n (%) or
|Health Promotion Behaviors
|t or F (p)|
|Experience of severe illness (one's own)||No||298||(90.0)||2.57±0.387||-0.11|
|Experience severe illness (significant others)||No||177||(53.5)||2.59±0.404||-1.16|
Those aged 20 or older had significantly more health promotion behaviors than others (t=2.15, p=.033). An examination of university level as a variable indicated that health promotion behaviors among juniors were significantly higher than those of freshmen (F=2.71, p=.045). There were no significant differences in health promotion behaviors according to sex, religion, university level, or whether college students or their significant others had experienced a relatively serious disease (Table 1).
3.2. Levels of Health Consciousness, Health Perception, Self-Esteem, and Health Promotion Behaviors
On average, the health consciousness score of respondents was 4.15 points, and their health perception score was 2.12 points (both ranging from 1 to 5). On average, the self-esteem score was 3.48 points (range of 1 to 5), and the health promotion behaviors score was 2.57 points (range of 1 to 4). An examination of other categories of health promotion behaviors revealed the following average scores: self-actualization, 3.01 points; health responsibility, 2.20 points; exercise and nutrition, 2.02 points; interpersonal relationship, 3.04 points; and stress management, 2.74 points (Table 2).
|Health promotion behaviors||1-4||2.57±0.389|
|Exercise and Nutrition||2.02±0.596|
3.3. Correlations Between Health Consciousness, Health Perception, Self-Esteem, and Health Promotion Behaviors
Table 3 shows the correlations between health promotion behaviors and other variables. Each variable was tested for normality using the Kolmogorov-Smirnov test and a normal distribution was verified. In addition, the straight-line relationship between the variables was examined and analyzed as Pearson correlations. Health promotion behaviors had positive correlations with health consciousness (r=.421, p<.001), health perception (r=.326, p<.001), and self-esteem (r=.526, p<.001) (Table 3).
|Variables||Health Cognition||Health Perception||Self-Esteem|
|Health promotion behaviors||.421(<.001)||.326(<.001)||.526(<.001)|
3.4. Variables Affecting Health Promotion Behaviors
Multiple regression analysis was used to analyze the effects of health promotion behaviors. Health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem were used as explanatory variables, and age was set as a control variable. A review of the assumptions of the regression analysis showed that the residuals were normally distributed, and in terms of multicollinearity, tolerances were .81 to .85 and the variation information factor was 1.18 to 1.23. Therefore, multicollinearity was not present. An analysis of the explanatory variables showed that health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem were statistically significant. A model including these variables showed an explanatory power of 34.9% (F=58.37, p<.001) on the health promotion behaviors of the participants (Table 4).
|Variables||B||S. E.||β||t (p)||R2||F (p)|
|Intercept||31.80||8.07||3.94 (<.001)||.349||58.37 (<.001)|
|Health cognition||1.49||.31||.23||4.69 (<.001)|
|Health perception||.28||.11||.12||2.55 (.011)|
The purpose of this research was to identify the extent of college students’ health consciousness, health perception, self-esteem, and health promotion behaviors, and to identify the variables affecting these health promotion behaviors. According to this study’s findings, health promotion behaviors of college students were scored 2.57 points on average. In similar studies, health promotion behaviors in college students were scored 2.31  and 2.67 . Therefore, this research has found an average level of health promotion behaviors overall. When the sub-categories of these behaviors were examined, interpersonal relationship and self-actualization scores were relatively higher than other categories at 3.04 points and 3.01 points, respectively. Exercise and nutrition scores were the lowest at 2.02; this is consistent with previous studies of college students [30-32]. Arguably, the reason that mental health promotion behaviors scores-such as interpersonal relationship and self-actualization-were higher is because the college period is usually during early adulthood, a period in which individuals establish their self-identity and focus on various tasks in preparation for adulthood . However, the finding that the level of exercise and healthy eating was low, and that this is consistent with previous studies, may also be due to the tendency of college students to skip breakfast and to exercise irregularly . Students are also given more freedom upon entering college, and their diet and sleep patterns become irregular . They are more likely to experience lifestyle changes-they leave their home to live in a dormitory, boarding house, or rented room ; and there are changes to their support system. Therefore, it may be difficult to maintain health promotion behaviors such as exercise and healthy eating. Additionally, studies show that college students recognize drinking as an important tool in forming interpersonal relationships, and drink frequently in social gatherings with members of clubs, or with junior and senior schoolmates . Students may choose smoking and drinking  as a means of reducing stress related to interpersonal relationships (e.g., romantic relationships, friendships, or relationships with professors) or stressors related to self-actualization (e.g., their future or academic performance). This suggests that the stress of interpersonal relationships or self-actualization can have a negative effect on physical well-being and the promotion of health behaviors. Accordingly, it is necessary to manage mental and physical health in a balanced way, including the use of coping strategies to maintain mental health. Another means of achieving this is through the introduction of intervention measures, such as a change of environment and support systems to accomplish physical health goals, including exercise and good nutrition.
Analysis of the general characteristics of the participants in this study showed that those aged 20 years or older had the highest level of health promotion behaviors, and that juniors displayed a greater degree of these behaviors than freshmen. This is consistent with the results of previous studies, which reported differences in health promotion behaviors depending on the age  and university level  of respondents. This is likely because freshmen have trouble managing the newfound freedom of college life, relative to the structured environment they experienced during high school . This finding supports those of a report that showed that in the college environment, students gain new responsibilities and experience the stress of needing to adapt to that new environment; consequently, they often choose smoking and drinking as a means of controlling stress , and have fewer exercise activities . Accordingly, it is necessary to recognize that students in their freshmen year are particularly vulnerable to health-related problems compared to during other college periods and to highlight the need to develop a comprehensive stress management program that considers the pressures and the specific context of college.
This study found no difference in health promotion behaviors depending on whether college students themselves or their family members, relatives or significant others, had experienced a serious disease. This supports the findings of a previous study, which reported no significant difference in health promotion behaviors if respondents had a family member suffering from a chronic disease . This means that neither the direct nor the indirect experience of the disease can bring about improvements in health promotion behaviors. Considering the studies that identified no correlation between health knowledge and health promotion behaviors , it is unlikely that knowledge about or experience of disease influences health promotion behaviors. Rather, it is the degree to which one perceives health as a problem that determines the degree to which knowledge or experience of disease impacts health promotion behaviors. Consequently, it is thought that disease or circumstantial characteristics can lead to various results. This is contradicted by the findings of a study, which argued that the experience of a chronic disease in family members served as an opportunity to realize the importance of health and health-related problems; as a result, this study claimed, those who had someone with chronic disease in their family performed more health promotion behaviors than those without such experience . Given these contradictory findings, additional research examining the impact of direct or indirect disease experience on health promotion behaviors is necessary; if disease experience is proven to have an effect, a strategy linking these findings with health promotion behaviors is required.
A model established based the variables influencing health promotion behaviors found that health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem were significant. Health consciousness is a concept showing how integrated health interests are in an individual’s daily activities . An individual with a higher level of health consciousness is correspondingly health-oriented with a positive and proactive attitude towards health management overall, including exercise and healthy food. This also seems to contribute to a high level of health promotion behaviors. Accordingly, it seems that a positive attitude towards health has a positive effect on health promotion behaviors. Furthermore, in this research, a higher degree of health perception led to a correspondingly high level of health promotion behaviors; this is consistent with the findings of previous studies [43, 44]. When an individual perceives that his or her health status is good, they perform health promotion behaviors well. This supports the findings of a previous study, which showed that a higher level of perceived health strengthened self-determination and internal motivation, and that this had a direct effect on health behaviors . This implies that the subjective perception of health is an important variable affecting health behaviors. In addition, a higher level of self-esteem resulted in a higher level of health promotion behaviors, which was also consistent with the findings of previous studies [13, 14]. College students with higher self-esteem were shown to have lower stress levels and a positive attitude towards their life, and they thus performed health promotion behaviors appropriately. Conversely, college students with low self-esteem tended to experience depression, anxiety, and higher stress levels, and they therefore experienced more health-related problems . As higher self-esteem equates to a positive attitude towards the practice of health promotion behaviors, it is necessary to develop a program improving self-esteem in college students.
The findings of this research confirm that physical health promotion behaviors among college students may be particularly vulnerable. As college students are in a new and relatively free environment, it is easy for them to neglect their health promotion behaviors in their regular daily activities. Therefore, college students can be particularly vulnerable to health promotion. Given the variables influencing health promotion behaviors in college students-health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem-this research suggests that it is necessary to perceptions of the importance of health and health management among students, and to develop intervention strategies for the promotion of self-esteem.
This research sought to identify levels of health consciousness, health perception, self-esteem, and health promotion behaviors among college students. To do so, this study examined the variables affecting the promotion of health behaviors. A health promotion behaviors model was established using data from 331 college students, and it demonstrated that health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem were significant explanatory variables. This model explained 34.9% of variance in health promotion behaviors. Throughout the college period, which is typically during early adulthood, students are exposed to an environment that places their health at risk. Health promotion behaviors are necessary for this age group because they improve health consciousness, health perception, and self-esteem, which in turn enable the maintenance of physical, mental, and social well-being. To achieve this, the development and implementation of a training program are required, so that individuals can integrate healthy behaviors into their daily lives with the understanding that they can protect their own health.
ETHICS APPROVAL AND CONSENT TO PARTICIPATE
HUMAN AND ANIMAL RIGHTS
No animals/humans were used for studies that are the basis of this research.
CONSENT FOR PUBLICATION
Informed written consent was obtained from all the participants.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
The authors declare no conflict of interest, financial or otherwise.
|||Fish C, Nies MA. Health promotion needs of students in a college environment. Public Health Nurs 1996; 13(2): 104-11.
|||Park YJ, Lee SJ, Oh KS, et al. Social support, stressful life events, and health behaviors of Korean undergraduate students. J Korean Acad Nurs 2002; 32: 792-802.
|||Kim YH, Joung MS, Lee J. Study on health promoting behavior determinant of nursing students. Journal of Korean Public Health Nursing 2002; 16: 285-303.|
|||Kim EA, Chung YK, Kim KS. A Study on the relations of health promoting daily life style and self-efficiency in boys’ high. J Korean Soc Sch Health 2000; 13: 241-59.|
|||Choi HJ, Chung YK. A study on the performance of health behaviors and relation variables in college students. Chung-Ang Journal of Nursing 2001; 4: 439-50.|
|||Kim YB. An analysis on the change of health status, health behavior, and influencing factors among American college and university students. J Health Educ Promot 2010; 27: 153-63.|
|||US Department of Health and Human Services. Health People 2010: Understanding and improving health. 2nd ed. US Government Printing Office, Washington DC 2000.|
|||Lee SH. A study of influencing variables of health promotion behaviors of college students. Korean J Med 1996; 61: 981-94.|
|||Ryu EJ, Kwon YM, Lee KS. A study on psychosocial well-being and health promotion lifestyle practices of university students. Korean J Health Educ Promot 2001; 18: 49-60.|
|||Kim JS, Cho B. Association between self-perceived health status and health related behavior in routine health examinees. Korean J Fam Med 2010; 31: 688-96.
|||Lee BS, Kim MY, Kim MH, Kim SK. Health belief and performance of health behaviors of some university students in Korea. J Korean Acad Nurs 2000; 30: 213-24.
|||Kim JH, Kim SJ, Park YH. Factors influencing health promoting behavior of woman college students. J Korean Acad Adult Nurs 2001; 13: 431-40.|
|||Oh JW, Moon YS. A predictive model of health promotion behavior in nursing students. J Digital Convergence 2014; 12: 391-403.
|||Brown GW, Andrews B, Bifulco A, Veiel H. Self-esteem and depression. 1. Measurement issues and prediction of onset. Soc Psychiatry Psychiatr Epidemiol 1990; 25(4): 200-9.
|||Faul F, Erdfelder E, Buchner A, Lang AG. Statistical power analyses using G*Power 3.1: Tests for correlation and regression analyses. Behav Res Methods 2009; 41(4): 1149-60.
|||Jayanti RK, Burns AC. The antecedents of preventive health care behavior: An empirical study. J Acad Mark Sci 1998; 26: 6-15.
|||Suh JH. Does the abundance of health information make a person with the high level of health knowledge? The effects of selective exposure on health information seeking and information scanning. Master thesis. Seoul: Seoul National University 2015.|
|||Dutta-Bergman MJ. Primary sources of health information: Comparisons in the domain of health attitudes, health cognitions, and health behaviors. Health Commun 2004; 16(3): 273-88.
|||Moore BS, Newsome JA, Payne PL, Tiansawad S. Nursing research: quality of life and perceived health in the elderly. J Gerontol Nurs 1993; 19(11): 7-14.
|||Ware JE. Health perception questionnaire instruments for measuring nursing practice and other care variables 1979.|
|||Yoo JS, Kim CJ, Park JW. A Study of the correlation between health perception, health behavior, and health status of adolescents. YonSei NonChong 1985; 21: 169-87.|
|||Lee KS, Chung YS. A study on health perception and health promoting behavior in the elderly. J Korean Community Nurs 1998; 9: 72-88.|
|||Rosenberg M. Society and the adolescent self-image 1965.
|||Jon BJ. Self-esteem: A test of its measurability. YonSei NonChong 1974; 11: 107-30.|
|||Pender NJ. Health promotion in nursing practice 2nd ed. 1987.|
|||Walker SN, Sechrist KR, Pender NJ. The health-promotion lifestyle profile: Development and psychometric characteristic. Nurs Sci 1987; 36: 730-42.|
|||Seo YY. Health promoting lifestyle, hardiness and gender role characteristics in middle-aged women. Korean J Women Health Nurs 1996; 2: 119-34.|
|||Yang NH, Moon SY. The impact of health status, health promoting behaviors, and social problem ability on college adjustment among nursing students. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2013; 19: 33-42.
|||Kim MS. A study on the relationship between perceived health state, personality, situational barrier, health promoting behavior in students. Korean J Adult Nurs 2004; 16: 442-51.|
|||Park IS, Kim R, Park MH. A study of factors influencing health promoting behaviors in nursing students. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2007; 13: 203-11.|
|||Lee RL, Loke AJ. Health-promoting behaviors and psychosocial well-being of university students in Hong Kong. Public Health Nurs 2005; 22(3): 209-20.
|||Lee IJ, Choi HK. Human behavior and the social environment 1999.|
|||Chang OJ, Chaung SK. Eating habits and workout patterns of some college students. Journal of Korea Community Health Nursing Academic Society 2000; 14: 415-30.|
|||Joe SY, Lee IS, Ham YL, Kim JH. Factors leading to health promotion behavior among the students in a nursing school of a university-based on the SAT. J Korean Acad Soc Nurs Educ 2006; 12: 78-85.|
|||Kim SS, Chung SK. Changes in alcohol use and problem drinking among college students: 2006-2008. Journal of Alcohol Science 2009; 10: 75-88.|
|||Chon KK, Kim KH, Yi JS. Development of the revised life stress scale for college students. Hangug Simlihag Hoeji Geongang 2000; 5: 316-35.|
|||Cho TH, Kim MS, Nagahiro C. Effects of drinking status lifestyle and health status in Korean and Japanese nursing students. J Korean Commun Health Nurs Acad Soc 2004; 18: 286-98.|
|||Steptoe A, Wardle J, Cui W, et al. Trends in smoking, diet, physical exercise, and attitudes toward health in European university students from 13 countries, 1990-2000. Prev Med 2002; 35(2): 97-104.
|||Von Ah D, Ebert S, Ngamvitroj A, Park N, Kang DH. Predictors of health behaviours in college students. J Adv Nurs 2004; 48(5): 463-74.
|||Huh EG, Chung YK, Yeoum SG. A study on the relations between a health promoting daily lifestyle and self-efficiency in university students. J Korean Soc Sch Health 1998; 11: 203-15.|
|||Jayanti RK, Burns AC. The antecedents of preventive health care behavior: An empirical study. J Acad Mark Sci 1998; 26: 6-15.
|||Kim SJ, Jung EY. A relevance on health perception, health knowledge and health promotion behavior of the university students. J Korea Acad Ind Cooperation Soc 2015; 16: 5394-403.
|||Paek KS, Choi YH. A study of the factors influencing health promoting behavior and satisfaction of life in female college students. J Korean Soc Health Edu Promot 2003; 20: 121-47.|
|||Cox CL, Miller EH, Mull CS. Motivation in health behavior: measurement, antecedents, and correlates. ANS Adv Nurs Sci 1987; 9(4): 1-15.
|||Shin HK, Chang JY. The relationship among personality characteristics, gender, job-seeking stress and mental health in college seniors. Korean J Clin Psychol 2003; 22: 815-27.|